Direct, stereoselective thioglycosylation enabled by an organophotoredox radical strategy†

Received: 02 Jan 2020, Revised: 17 Jan 2020, Accepted: 05 May 2020, Available online: 18 June 2020, Version of Record: 18 June 2020

Peng Ji,a Yueteng Zhang,a Feng Gao,a Fangchao Bia and Wei Wang *a


Author affiliations
* Corresponding authors
a Departments of Pharmacology and Toxicology and Chemistry and Biochemistry, BIO5 Institute, and University of Arizona Cancer Centre, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
E-mail: wwang@pharmacy.arizona.edu

Abstract


While strategies involving a 2e− transfer pathway have dictated glycosylation development, the direct glycosylation of readily accessible glycosyl donors as radical precursors is particularly appealing because of high radical anomeric selectivity and atom- and step-economy. However, the development of the radical process has been challenging owing to notorious competing reduction, elimination and/or SN side reactions of commonly used, labile glycosyl donors. Here we introduce an organophotocatalytic strategy through which glycosyl bromides can be efficiently converted into corresponding anomeric radicals by photoredox mediated HAT catalysis without a transition metal or a directing group and achieve highly anomeric selectivity. The power of this platform has been demonstrated by the mild reaction conditions enabling the synthesis of challenging α-1,2-cis-thioglycosides, the tolerance of various functional groups and the broad substrate scope for both common pentoses and hexoses. Furthermore, this general approach is compatible with both sp2 and sp3 sulfur electrophiles and late-stage glycodiversification for a total of 50 substrates probed.
Graphical abstract: Direct, stereoselective thioglycosylation enabled by an organophotoredox radical strategy



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57202719978
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.