Cross dehydrogenative C–O coupling catalysed by a catenane-coordinated copper(i)†

Received: 12 Feb 2020, Revised: 14 Feb 2020, Accepted: 22 May 2020, Available online: 18 June 2020, Version of Record: 18 June 2020

Lihui Zhu,a Jiasheng Li,a Jun Yang a , and Ho Yu Au-Yeung *ab

Author affiliations
* Corresponding authors
a Department of Chemistry, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, P. R. China
E-mail: hoyuay@hku.hk
b State Key Laboratory of Synthetic Chemistry, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, P. R. China

Abstract


Catalytic activity of copper(I) complexes supported by phenanthroline-containing catenane ligands towards a new C(sp3)–O dehydrogenative cross-coupling of phenols and bromodicarbonyls is reported. As the phenanthrolines are interlocked by the strong and flexible mechanical bond in the catenane, the active catalyst with an open copper coordination site can be revealed only transiently and the stable, coordinatively saturated Cu(I) pre-catalyst is quickly regenerated after substrate transformation. Compared with a control Cu(I) complex supported by non-interlocked phenanthrolines, the catenane-supported Cu(I) is highly efficient with a broad substrate scope, and can be applied in gram-scale transformations without a significant loss of the catalytic activity. This work demonstrates the advantages of the catenane ligands that provide a dynamic and responsive copper coordination sphere, highlighting the potential of the mechanical bond as a design element in transition metal catalyst development.
Graphical abstract: Cross dehydrogenative C–O coupling catalysed by a catenane-coordinated copper(i)



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=35376908100
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.