MILP-Based Differential Cryptanalysis on IVLBC and Eslice-64

Received: 02 Aug 2024, Revised: 19 Aug 2024, Accepted: 29 August 2024, Available online: 11 Nov 2024, Version of Record:

Hongluan Zhao, Guoyong Han, Letian Wang, Wen Wang

Abstract



Mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model was presented by Sun <italic>et al.</italic> at Asiacrypt 2014 to search for differential characteristics of block ciphers. Based on this model, it is easy to assess block ciphers against differential attack. In this paper, the MILP model is improved to search for differential trails of Midori64 which is a family of lightweight block ciphers provided by Banik <italic>et al.</italic> at Asiacrypt 2015. We find the best 5-round differential characteristics of Midori64 with MILP-based model, and the probabilities are <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$2^{-52}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$2^{-58}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> respectively. Based on these distinguishers, we give key recovery attacks on the 11-round reduced Midori64 with data complexities of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$2^{55.6}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$2^{61.2}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, and time complexities of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$2^{109.35}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$2^{100.26}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>.



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://www.scopus.com/results/results.uri?sort=plf-f&src=s&sid=64a8df401228b0911dee108833adb067&sot=a&sdt=a&sl=266&s=SOURCE-ID+%2817294%29AND%28%28+PUBYEAR+%3d+2024%29+OR+%28+PUBYEAR+%3d+2023%29+OR+%28+PUBYEAR+%3d+2022%29+OR+%28+PUBYEAR+%3d+2021%29%29AND+%28%28++DOCTYPE+%28+ar+%29++OR++DOCTYPE+%28+re+%29++OR++DOCTYPE+%28+cp+%29++OR++DOCTYPE+%28+dp+%29++OR++DOCTYPE+%28+ch+%29++%29+AND+NOT+DOCTYPE+%28+undefined+%29%29+AND++NOT+PUBSTAGE+%28+aip+%29++&origin=sourceinfo&zone=CSCYpreview&txGid=7e23f9
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.