Analysis of the Brownian Motion Approach for Ballistic Resistance Evaluation Using the Maximum Likelihood Inference

Received: 02 Aug 2024, Revised: 10 Aug 2024, Accepted: 29 August 2024, Available online: 30 sep 2024, Version of Record: 30 sep 2024

Beya Tahenti, Frederik Coghe, Irene Ndindabahizi, R. Nasri

Abstract



Armor technologists’ improvement of protection systems led to the design of complex systems. Given the risk factor on human life, increasing requirements on the ballistic resistance evaluation are imposed. Consequently, an increased effort is dedicated to estimating the perforation probability curve as a function of the bullet impact velocity. The main limitation of methods that fits a normal law to perforation velocities is their purely statistical character. A Brownian-based approach that couples the system response variability and physics was proposed using the Chi-square and Kolmogorov-Smirnov criterion function for model parameters estimation. One major limitation of this inference approach is the large experimental database required for its execution. The contribution of this paper is the introduction of the maximum likelihood inference for parameters estimation of the Brownian-based approach. The agreement between the obtained results and the experimental ones confirms the appropriateness of the likelihood inference to solve the studied problem. Moreover, the estimations uncertainty was analyzed and compared to the existing method ones. It was observed that the proposed model reduces the confidence intervals on key velocity estimations. Accordingly, the present work encourages the adoption of this proposed methodology in a laboratory context with a restrained sample size.
Configuration parameter

Configuration parameter
… 
Impact results of two spaced mild steel plates impacted by a 5.56x45 mm NATO Ball.

Impact results of two spaced mild steel plates impacted by a 5.56x45 mm NATO Ball.
… 
Inference results for the stochastic model's parameters
 



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://www.scopus.com/sources.uri
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.