Compact UWB Monopole Antenna With Tunable Dual Band Notched Characteristics for WiMAX and WLAN Applications

Received: 20 July 2023, Revised: 23 July 2023, Accepted: 05 Aug 2023, Available online: 09 Sep 2023, Version of Record: 09 Sep 2023

Vikas Kumar Rai, Mithilesh Kumar

Abstract



The present work shows a planar compact ultra-wideband (UWB) monopole antenna with controllable dualband-notch frequencies at 3.3 GHz for WiMAX and 5 GHz for WLAN. In the proposed antenna, the lower notchband (at a frequency of 3.3 GHz) is made by cutting a thin horizontal strip on top of the radiating patch. The uppernotch band (at a frequency of 5 GHz) is made by putting two narrow parasitic strips in the shape of an “I” oneither side of the radiating patch. The incorporation of three varactor diodes between the radiating patch and three metallic strips provides the flexibility of adjusting the notch frequencies. The notch band tunability between 3.15 GHz and 3.69 GHz and between 4.93 GHz and 5.59 GHz, respectively, is achieved by changing the bias voltageof the varactor diode between 0 V and 30 V. The gain and efficiency characteristics of the designed antenna alsoexhibit band rejection at the respective notch frequencies. The design principle is validated by fabricating andmeasuring a prototype of the proposed dual-band, notched UWB antenna. For three different bias voltages of thevaractor, the simulated and experimental findings are in reasonable agreement. The proposed works demonstratebetter-notch characteristics as compared with other reported works over the UWB range
Geometry of the proposed tunable dual band-notched antenna for WiMAX/WLAN applications.

Geometry of the proposed tunable dual band-notched antenna for WiMAX/WLAN applications.
… 
simulated versus measured results comparison at three conditions, (a) Ci = Cj = 2.67 pF (0V), (b) Ci = Cj = 1.55 pF (2V), and (c) C i = C j = 1.17 pF (5V).

simulated versus measured results comparison at three conditions, (a) Ci = Cj = 2.67 pF (0V), (b) Ci = Cj = 1.55 pF (2V), and (c) C i = C j = 1.17 pF (5V).
… 
Simulated versus measured results comparison for (a) gain and (b) efficiency at Ci = Cj =1.55 pF (2 V).

Simulated versus measured results comparison for (a) gain and (b) efficiency at Ci = Cj =1.55 pF (2 V).
… 
Comparison of proposed work as compared to other similarly reported works in the literature

Comparison of proposed work as compared to other similarly reported works in the literature
… 



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57188714763
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.