Common Bulkhead Tank Design for Cryogenic Stage of an Indian Launch Vehicle

Received: 11 Mar 2022, Revised: 13 Mar 2022, Accepted: 14 May 2022, Available online: 26 May 2022, Version of Record: 26 May 2022

Yogesh Pratap Singh; Harjit Singh; Prahlad Kumar Sahu; Muthukumar R

Abstract


Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) has been advancing in space technology with its cost-effective techniques. Currently, ISRO, in its cryogenic stages, uses truss type intertank structure, which induces large concentrated loads at the truss interfaces. As a remedial measure, works on closed intertank are being carried out by them, but this configuration will considerably increase the launch vehicle mass compared to truss type. Therefore, after a thorough literature survey, a Common bulkhead (CBH) tank seemed to be the best solution to the aforementioned problem. Detailed research on sandwich-type CBH has been carried out in this paper with the motivation of saving mass and height in launch vehicles. Suitable core and facesheet material were selected. A novel foam-filled honeycomb core is suggested in this work. Several comparisons in various CBH dome designs were carried out to reach for the best possible configuration and composition that can be used. MATLAB®, SolidWorks®, and ANSYS® were used in parallel for all computations dealing with design and analysis. A mass saving of approximately upto 490 kgs and a height reduction of upto 1.755 m was obtained with the final selected configuration with respect to the current GSLV configuration. These savings can add extra payload capacity to ISRO launch vehicles in their future missions.
Truss rod type intertank structure.

Truss rod type intertank structure.
… 
Closely stiffened intertank structure.

Closely stiffened intertank structure.
… 
Common bulkhead tank.

Common bulkhead tank.
… 
Nested tank. Figure 5. Height reduction in the CBH tank as compared to a truss type.

Nested tank. Figure 5. Height reduction in the CBH tank as compared to a truss type.
… 
Comparison of mass for each component for different CBH radii

Comparison of mass for each component for different CBH radii
… 



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57392357800
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.