Thermodynamic Investigation of a Modified Compression Ignition Engine Fueled by Diesel-Biodiesel-Ethanol Blends

Received: 05 Mar 2022, Revised: 07 Mar 2022, Accepted: 11 May 2022, Available online: 26 May 2022, Version of Record: 26 May 2022

R.T. Sarathbabu; M Lakshmikantha Reddy; M Kannan; Rb balaji Balaji

Abstract



The present study contrasts the thermodynamics analysis of modified diesel engines with traditional diesel engines. Thermodynamics study is done by the use of energy and exergy analysis for diesel, B20 (blend of 80 per cent diesel by volume with 20 per cent mahua biodiesel) and LHR modification and LTC 15 per cent EGR fuelled with B20 blend and 5 per cent ethanol with various loads ranging from no load to full load. Implemented two technologies for increasing engine efficiency. One of the primary techniques is the Low Heat Rejection (LHR) concept (or the so-called “Adiabatic” engine) applied. In the engine cylinder, a ceramic layer of Alumina (Al2O3) was used to modify the Low Heat Rejection (LHR). Another technique is Low-temperature combustion (LTC) modes are added by joining the inlet and exhaust pipes through valves to control the exhaust gas at an optimal rate of 15 per cent. The findings of energy and exergy distribution in the engine were compared using optimum alterations with fuel blends such as 20 per cent mahua biodiesel and 5 per cent ethanol. From energy distribution, best shaft power (QBP) (2.8kW) is transformed from heat input observed in the optimum altered engine at full load conditions compared to others. Due to modifications employed in the engine and fuels. Maximum unaccounted energy (QUN) loss in diesel (44 %). And highest thermal efficiency (31.2 %) is revealed in B20E5 (LHR+15 % LTC). From exergy distribution, it noticed that the same trend of energy distribution and at 100 per cent load condition, maximum (12.54kW) in diesel and minimum (8.45 kW) in B20E5 (LHR+15 % LTC) has obtained input availability (Ain).The maximum conversion rate of availability in brake power (Abp) (0.61 kW) in B20 (LHR). Compared to diesel, second law or exergetic efficiency more in B20E5 (LHR+15 % LTC).
Different engine load conditions at the variation of (a) heat input (Q in ), (b) shaft Power (Q BP ), (c) Energy in the Exhaust gas (Q Ex ), (d) unaccounted energy loss (Q UN ), (e) thermal efficiency.

Different engine load conditions at the variation of (a) heat input (Q in ), (b) shaft Power (Q BP ), (c) Energy in the Exhaust gas (Q Ex ), (d) unaccounted energy loss (Q UN ), (e) thermal efficiency.
… 
Distribution of Exergy at different engine load conditions: (a) 0%, (b) 25%, (c) 50%, (d) 75% (e) 100%.

Distribution of Exergy at different engine load conditions: (a) 0%, (b) 25%, (c) 50%, (d) 75% (e) 100%.
… 
Different engine load conditions at variation of availability in (a) input (A in ), (b) brake power (A bp ), (c) exhaust gases (A ex ), (d) destruction (A d ), (e) second law efficiency.

Different engine load conditions at variation of availability in (a) input (A in ), (b) brake power (A bp ), (c) exhaust gases (A ex ), (d) destruction (A d ), (e) second law efficiency.
… 
Properties of tested fuels

Properties of tested fuels
… 
Mass fraction of fuels

Mass fraction of fuels
… 
Figures - available via license: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Generic
Content may be subject to copyright.
 



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57406580000
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.