Characterisation and Modelling of Particulate Composite with Flaky Aluminium Additives.

Received: 27 May 2024, Revised: 29 May 2024, Accepted: 10 Aug 2024, Available online: 18 Aug 2024, Version of Record: 18 Aug 2024

Rao, Chethana P.; Subramanian, Harini; Murthy, H.; Ramakrishna, P. A.; Mulay, Shantanu S.

Abstract


The utilisation of flaky aluminium as an additive in the composite matrix has shown the ability to overcome the brittle nature encountered in epoxy resins. The additive increases the overall composite toughness without compromising its strength. The novelty of the present work is the demonstration of modelling the constitutive response of the particulate composite from the uniaxial tension tests conducted at three different displacement rates. Utilising two different mean-field homogenisation schemes (Dilute inclusion and Mori-Tanaka), the macroscale properties were estimated and compared with the material constants obtained from experiments for this new particulate composite, which is proposed in the current study. The rate-independent response, at lower loading rates, is modelled by the elasto-plastic (EP) model, and the rate-dependent response, at higher loading rates, is modelled by elastic-viscoplastic (VP) model while capturing an inelastic deformation as seen in the fractographs. The EP and VP model material constants are then successfully obtained by optimisation employing the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm and are eventually used in validating the experimental stress response.
Subjects
ALUMINUM compositesEPOXY resinsADDITIVESTOUGHNESS (Personality trait)



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A15%3A28280879/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Aresult-item&id=ebsco%3Adoi%3A10.14429%2Fdsj.74.19895&bquery=Defence%20Science%20Journal&page=2&link_origin=www.google.com
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.