Prediction of Mechanical Response of Nickel Based Superalloy Subjected to Creep Fatigue Interaction Loading Using Unified Mechanics Theory.

Received: 11 June 2024, Revised: 17 June 2024, Accepted: 25 July 2024, Available online: 18 Aug 2024, Version of Record: 18 Aug 2024

Mangal, Saurabh; Sudhamsu Kambhammettu, Sri Krishna; C., Lakshmana Rao; Chellapandi, Perumal

Abstract


In order to simulate and predictmaterial’s real-time responses for a component under complex mechanical and thermal loads, continuum damage mechanics (CDM) is employed. However, majority of the models found in the literature are phenomenological and primarily based on curve fitting, which offer limited understanding of the underlying physics of the problem. A few physics-based models have been developed that provide greater insights. Unified mechanics theory (UMT) is one such approach thatcaptures entropy generation due to various dissipative mechanism which aims to explainthe physics of the problem. During hold time in strain-controlled creep-fatigue interaction loading, stress relaxation is observed.This study attempts to capture stress relaxation response due to creep-fatigue interaction of nickel-based superalloys using UMT, which is regarded as a more scientific method than simply fitting curves. The evolution of creep strain energy with hold time is used to understand how material ages over time due to stress relaxation during creep-fatigue interaction loading.
Subjects
CREEP (Materials)CONTINUUM damage mechanicsSTRAINS & stresses (Mechanics)ALLOY fatigueSCIENTIFIC method



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A4%3A28280884/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Aresult-item&id=ebsco%3Adoi%3A10.14429%2Fdsj.74.19901&bquery=Defence%20Science%20Journal&page=2&link_origin=www.google.com
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.