Investigation of KH560 Coupling Agent with Carbon Fiber One Step Dipping Method Compared with Functionalized Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes.
Abstract
Interlaminar and interfacial properties of composites are important parameters for any application, extensive research has been out bursting to enhance the above properties using nanotubes (NTs) as an alternate solution to minimize delamination of laminates. This research focused on significance of functionalized engineering materials for better efficiency in industries, especially stealth technology. Silane-coupling agent “3-glycidyletheroxypropyl-tri methoxy silane, KH-560” is one module among five modules designed in this work. Five modules are considered as (M1, M2, M3, M4 & M5) with (0.5wt % of AMINE, CARBOXYL, multi wall carbon nano tubes (MWCNTs), 5 % KH-560 treated carbon laminate and finally with base carbon fiber). PAN-based 12 k carbon fiber as base fiber with functionalized and non-functionalized nanocomposite are incorporated as fillers in the epoxy laminates fabricated using vacuum bagging technique. Findings indicated 5 % KH-560 silane treated carbon fiber (module M5) showed best results such as properties with 39 %, 55 % and 20 % in “tensile, flexural and interlaminar shear strength (ILSS)” respectively. FESEM analysis is conducted to understand morphology of the laminates.
Subjects
MULTIWALLED carbon nanotubes; COUPLING agents (Chemistry); CARBON fibers; CARBON fiber-reinforced ceramics; SHEAR strength; BASES (Architecture)
Description
Indexed in scopushttps://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A11%3A28280875/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Aresult-item&id=ebsco%3Adoi%3A10.14429%2Fdsj.74.19151&bquery=Defence%20Science%20Journal&page=2&link_origin=www.google.com |
Article metrics10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views : |
Cite |
Full Text![]() |
Conflict of interest
“Authors state no conflict of interest”
Funding Information
This research received no external funding or grants
Peer review:
Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal
Ethics approval:
Not applicable.
Consent for publication:
Not applicable.
Acknowledgements:
None.