Design and Performance Analysis of a Switched Reluctance Motor Using Finite Element Analysis and Magnetic Equivalent Circuit Model.

Received: 17 June 2023, Revised: 20 June 2023, Accepted: 09 Sep 2023, Available online: 25 Sep 2023, Version of Record: 25 Sep 2023

B., Sandesh Bhaktha; Kumawat, Satish; Pitchaimani, Jeyaraj; Gangadharan, K. V.

Abstract


By being magnet-free, and mechanically robust with a longer constant power range, switched reluctance motor (SRM) is gathering much attention as a potential choice to propel electric vehicles (EVs) and hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs). This paper comprehensively investigates the performance sensitivity to geometric design variables such as rotor diameter, pole arc angles, and yoke thicknesses for an SRM using static two-dimensional (2D) electromagnetic Finite-Element Analysis (FEA). The reason for the change in static characteristics due to variation in reluctance between SRM designs has not been detailed previously. This is addressed by the magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC) model that simplifies the design analysis. Results indicate that stator pole reluctance needs to be given due importance while studying the influence of rotor diameter. Also, it is imperative to set an adequate thickness of the stator and rotor yokes to minimize the effect of saturation on the performance. Rotor diameter and stator pole arc angle have a pronounced influence on the performance while the influence of rotor pole arc angle and yoke thicknesses was relatively less.
Subjects
SWITCHED reluctance motorsMAGNETIC circuitsFINITE element methodRELUCTANCE motorsHYBRID electric vehicles



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A13%3A28280765/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Aresult-item&id=ebsco%3Adoi%3A10.14429%2Fdsj.73.17828&bquery=Defence%20Science%20Journal&page=4&link_origin=www.google.com
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.