Effect of Twin Island Configuration on Airwake Aerodynamics over Generic Aircraft Carrier Using CFD.

Received: 14 Aug 2023, Revised: 26 Aug 2023, Accepted: 08 Dec 2023, Available online: 11 Dec 2023, Version of Record: 11 Dec 2023

Nehra, Ankit; Rajagopalan, Vijayakumar

Abstract


The technological advancements have led to the evolution of numerous concepts in an aircraft carrier’s top-deck design, the twin island concept being the latest entrant. An aircraft carrier’s bluff body geometry presents many challenges to the pilot, landing on deck being the most critical. The present study aims to undertake a computational investigation of the aerodynamic analysis of a Twin Island GAC (Generic Aircraft Carrier) conceptualized vis-à-vis its base variant. The flow over the twin island GAC flight deck and downstream is analysed using various transverse planes perpendicular to the flow direction as detailed in the paper. Subsequently, a parametric study was undertaken for understanding the effects of longitudinal translations of the two islands with respect to the baseline GAC position. The results depict the advantage of certain variants of twin islands over a single island, and ~68 % reduction in turbulence is achieved along the glideslope by one of the variations which could aid in reducing pilot workload. The data can act as a catalyst for utilization and incorporation in future floating platform designs and further studies in this field.
Subjects
AIRCRAFT carriersAERODYNAMICSTECHNOLOGICAL innovationsISLANDSANATOMICAL planes



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A6%3A28280822/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Aresult-item&id=ebsco%3Adoi%3A10.14429%2Fdsj.73.18617&bquery=Defence%20Science%20Journal&page=3&link_origin=www.google.com
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.