Compact UWB Monopole Antenna With Tunable Dual Band Notched Characteristics for WiMAX and WLAN Applications.
Abstract
The present work shows a planar compact ultra-wideband (UWB) monopole antenna with controllable dual band-notch frequencies at 3.3 GHz for WiMAX and 5 GHz for WLAN. In the proposed antenna, the lower notch band (at a frequency of 3.3 GHz) is made by cutting a thin horizontal strip on top of the radiating patch. The upper notch band (at a frequency of 5 GHz) is made by putting two narrow parasitic strips in the shape of an "I" on either side of the radiating patch. The incorporation of three varactor diodes between the radiating patch and three metallic strips provides the flexibility of adjusting the notch frequencies. The notch band tunability between 3.15 GHz and 3.69 GHz and between 4.93 GHz and 5.59 GHz, respectively, is achieved by changing the bias voltage of the varactor diode between 0 V and 30 V. The gain and efficiency characteristics of the designed antenna also exhibit band rejection at the respective notch frequencies. The design principle is validated by fabricating and measuring a prototype of the proposed dual-band, notched UWB antenna. For three different bias voltages of the varactor, the simulated and experimental findings are in reasonable agreement. The proposed works demonstrate better-notch characteristics as compared with other reported works over the UWB range.
Subjects
MONOPOLE antennas; ULTRA-wideband antennas; VARACTORS; ANTENNAS (Electronics)
Description
Indexed in scopushttps://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A7%3A28280807/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Aresult-item&id=ebsco%3Adoi%3A10.14429%2Fdsj.73.17885&bquery=Defence%20Science%20Journal&page=3&link_origin=www.google.com |
Article metrics10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views : |
Cite |
Full Text![]() |
Conflict of interest
“Authors state no conflict of interest”
Funding Information
This research received no external funding or grants
Peer review:
Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal
Ethics approval:
Not applicable.
Consent for publication:
Not applicable.
Acknowledgements:
None.