REVIEW OF ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF PARABENS IN COSMETIC PRODUCTS

Received: 11 June 2020, Revised: 12 June 2020, Accepted: 22 Aug 2020, Available online: 09 Sep 2020, Version of Record: 09 Sep 2020

Faris Rudi
Science and Technology Research Institute for Defence (STRIDE), Ministry of Defence, Malaysia
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya (UM), Malaysia
Email: faris.rudi@stride.gov.my

Abstract


Parabens are well known preservatives that are widely used in cosmetic and personal care (CPC) products as they have a broad spectrum of antimicrobial properties, as well as being non-sensitising and non-irritating. Over the years, parabens have been considered to be a relatively safe compound.
However, a few studies found that parabens might have estrogenic properties and there is an ongoing debate regarding the potential risk of cancer from consuming this product. This paper presents an overview of sample preparation methods, as well as instrumental analysis of current and past researches on the determination of parabens in cosmetic products. It first reviews on sample preparation methods
that effectively eliminate complex matrices in cosmetics products, including liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), solid phase extraction (SPE), solid phase microextraction (SPME), dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE). Then, the analytical techniques for the analysis are reported, mainly using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), gas chromatography (GC) and electrophoresis. Research gaps and suggestions for future studies on the
detection of parabens in cosmetic products are also given.
Keywords: Parabens; cosmetic and personal care (CPC) products; complex matrices; sample preparation; analytical techniques.



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57204709956
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.