INVESTIGATION OF POLYURETHENE RESIN PERFORMANCE AS AN INTERLAYER IN LAMINATED GLASS SUBJECTED TO EXPLOSIVE LOADING

Received: 08 Feb 2021, Revised: 09 Mar 2021, Accepted: 22 July 2021, Available online: 08 Sep 2022, Version of Record: 08 Sep 2021

Mohammed Alias Yusof1*, Norazman Mohamad Nor1, Muhamad Azani Yahya1, Vikneswaran Munikanan1, Fakroul Ridzuan Hashim, 1 Arifin Ismail2 & Ho Chong Choai3
1Faculty of Engineering, National Defence University of Malaysia (NDUM), Malaysia
2Faculty of Management Studies, National Defence University of Malaysia (NDUM), Malaysia
3Secuglass Sdn. Bhd., Malaysia
*Email: alias@upnm.edu.my

Abstract


This paper investigates the performance of polyurethane resin interlayer in laminated glass subjected to explosive loading. In this research, a total three glass panels, which consisted of one 7.52 mm thick annealed glass panel and two 7.52 mm thick laminated glass panels, were subjected to air explosive with explosive charge weights of 200 and 400 g at a fix standoff distance of 1,500 mm. The blast test results showed that the 7.52 mm thick annealed glass was damaged when subjected to peak overpressure of up to 250 kPa resulting from 200 g of explosive. Meanwhile, the 7.52 mm thick laminated glass with polyurethane resin interlayer survived the peak pressures of 250 and 650 kPa resulting from 200 and 400 g of explosive respectively. The polyurethane resin interlayer successfully retained the glass fragments and reduced the risk of injuries from the glass breakage. The results showed that the laminated glass panel using polyurethane resin as an interlayer has potential to be used as a blast resistant laminated glass panel.
Keywords: Field blast test; polyurethane resin; annealed glass; laminated glass; explosive loading.



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=42263374100
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.