EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE OF GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS) SPEED METERS

Received: 10 Aug 2022, Revised: 22 Aug 2022, Accepted: 14 Dec 2024, Available online: 21 Dec 2022, Version of Record: 21 Dec 2022

Dinesh Sathyamoorthy*, Hafizah Mohd Yusoff , Ahmad Firdaus Ahmad Kazmar, Mohd Zuryn Mohd Daud & Maizurina Kifli Science & Technology Research Institute for Defence (STRIDE), Ministry of Defence, Malaysia *Email: dinesh.sathyamoorthy@stride.gov.my

Abstract


In this study, Global Positioning System (GPS) simulation is used to evaluate the performance of three commercial GPS speed meters: 1) S1: SkyRC GSM020; 2) S2: XOSS G+; and 3) S3: Magene C406. It is found that with decreasing GPS signal power level, speed errors increase due to decreasing carrier-to-noise density (C/N0) levels for GPS satellites tracked by the receiver, which is the ratio of received GPS signal power level to noise density. In addition, varying speed error patterns are observed for the each of the readings. This is due to the GPS satellite constellation being dynamic, causing varying GPS satellite geometry over location and time, resulting in GPS accuracy being location / time dependent It is found that the R3 receiver provided the lowest position errors for both the open area and obstruction area scenarios due to it having higher receiver sensitivity and lower receiver noise, which allows it track higher C/N0 levels for the available GPS satellites. All three GPS speed meters are found to have relatively similar speed errors. However, Speed Meter S1 is observed to be able to operate at lower GPS signal power levels as compared to the other speed meters. This could be as it higher receiver sensitivity and lower receiver noise, which allows it track higher C/N0 levels for the available GPS satellites.
Keywords: Global Positioning System (GPS) simulation; speed measurement; Doppler shift; GPS signal power level; GPS satellite geometry.



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=16680164600
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.