SETI: the argument for artefact searches

Received: 18 June 2020, Revised: 19 June 2020, Accepted: 07 Sep 2020, Available online: 09 Sep 2020, Version of Record: 09 Sep 2020

Seth Shostak*
Affiliation:
SETI Institute, 189 Bernardo Ave, Mountain View, CA94043, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Seth Shostak, E-mail: seth@seti.org

Abstract


Abstract
For six decades, SETI has attempted to prove the existence of technologically advanced intelligence by detecting artificially generated electromagnetic signals. While such signals could certainly exist and – given the right circumstances – might be measurable here on Earth, contemporary searches are all compromised by limited sensitivity and a reliance on persistent transmissions. The energy required for any putative transmitters, the possible wish of the senders to be cryptic, and a likely ignorance about Homo sapiens’ existence all lead to the reasonable conclusion that greater attention to artefact searches could hasten the discovery of alien intelligence. We consider both the motivation, the advantages and the disadvantages of this approach. We also enumerate some of the specific artefact strategies that have been proposed and pursued.

 
Keywords: ArtefactsSETIstrategies



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=7003702798
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.