Design optimization of composite egg-shaped submersible pressure hull for minimum buoyancy factor

Received: 12 Feb 2021, Revised: 15 Feb 2021, Accepted: 14 Nov 2021, Available online: 22 Dec 2021, Version of Record: 22 Dec 2021

Muhammad Imran a, Dongyan Shi a, Lili Tong b, Hafiz Muhammad Waqas a, Muqeem Uddin c
a
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, China
b
College of Aerospace and Civil Engineering Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, China
c
Pakhtunkhwa Energy Development Organization (PEDO), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

Abstract


This paper describes a design optimization study of the composite egg-shaped submersible pressure hull employing optimization and finite element analysis (FEA) tools as a first attempt to provide an optimized design of the composite egg-shaped pressure hull for manufacturing or further investigations. A total of 15 optimal designs for the composite egg-shaped pressure hull under hydrostatic pressure are obtained in terms of fibers’ angles and the number of layers for 5 lay-up arrangements and 3 unidirectional (UD) composite materials. The optimization process is performed utilizing a genetic algorithm and FEA in ANSYS. The minimization of the buoyancy factor (????.????) is selected as the objective for the optimization under constraints on both material failure and buckling strength. Nonlinear buckling analysis is conducted for one optimal design considering both geometric nonlinearity and imperfections. A sensitivity study is also conducted to further investigate the influence of the design variables on the optimal design of the egg-shaped pressure hull.

Keywords
Composite egg-shaped pressure hull
Design optimization
Buoyancy factor
Material failure
Buckling instability



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57200275504
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.