Numerical studies on four-engine rocket exhaust plume impinging on flame deflectors with afterburning

Received: 14 Mar 2021, Revised: 25 Mar 2021, Accepted: 02 Aug 2021, Available online: 08 Sep 2021, Version of Record: 08 Sep 2021

Zhi-tan Zhou, Chang-fang Zhao, Chen-yu Lu, Gui-gao Le
School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China

Abstract


This paper studies the four-engine liquid rocket flow field during the launching phase. Using three-dimensional compressible Navier-Stokes equations and two-equation realizable k-epsilon turbulence model, an impact model is established and flow fields of plume impinging on the two different shapes of flame deflectors, including wedge-shaped flame deflector and cone-shaped flame deflector, are calculated. The finite-rate chemical kinetics is used to track chemical reactions. The simulation results show that afterburning mainly occurs in the mixed layer. And the region of peak pressure occurs directly under the rocket nozzle, which is the result of the direct impact of exhaust plume. Compared with the wedge-shaped flame deflector, the cone-shaped flame deflector has great performance on guiding exhaust gas. The wedge-shaped and cone-shaped flame deflectors guide the supersonic exhaust plume away from the impingement point with two directions and circumferential direction, respectively. The maximum pressure and temperature on the wedge-shaped flame deflector surface are 37.2% and 9.9% higher than those for the cone-shaped flame deflector. The results provide engineering guidance and theoretical significance for design in flame deflector of the launch platforms.

Keywords
Four-engine rocket
Afterburning
Impinging flow field
Different deflectors
Numerical simulations



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57210342009
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.