Multi-objective design optimization of composite submerged cylindrical pressure hull for minimum buoyancy factor and maximum buckling load capacity

Received: 02 June 2021, Revised: 2 June 2021, Accepted: 11 Aug 2021, Available online: 08 Sep 2021, Version of Record: 08 Sep 2021

Muhammad Imran a, Dongyan Shi a, Lili Tong b, Ahsan Elahi a, Hafiz Muhammad Waqas a, Muqeem Uddin c
a
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, China
b
College of Aerospace and Civil Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, China
c
Pakhtunkhwa Energy Development Organization (PEDO), Peshawar, 25000, Pakistan

Abstract


This paper presents the design optimization of composite submersible cylindrical pressure hull subjected to 3 MPa hydrostatic pressure. The design optimization study is conducted for cross-ply layups [0s/90t/0u], [0s/90t/0u]s, [0s/90t]s and [90s/0t]s considering three uni-directional composites, i.e. Carbon/Epoxy, Glass/Epoxy, and Boron/Epoxy. The optimization study is performed by coupling a Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA) and Analytical Analysis. Minimizing the buoyancy factor and maximizing the buckling load factor are considered as the objectives of the optimization study. The objectives of the optimization are achieved under constraints on the Tsai-Wu, Tsai-Hill and Maximum Stress composite failure criteria and on buckling load factor. To verify the optimization approach, optimization of one particular layup configuration is also conducted in ANSYS with the same objectives and constraints.

Keywords
Multi-objective genetic algorithm
Optimization
Composite submersible pressure hull
Thin shell
Material failure
Shell buckling



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=58153251900
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.