Numerical investigation of the shockwave overpressure fields of multi-sources FAE explosions

Received: 25 May 2021, Revised: 02 June 2021, Accepted: 07 Aug 2021, Available online: 08 Sep 2021, Version of Record: 08 Sep 2021

Chun-hua Bai, Xing-yu Zhao, Jian Yao, Bin-feng Sun
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China

Abstract


Shockwaves from fuel-air explosive (FAE) cloud explosions may cause significant casualties. The ground overpressure field is usually used to evaluate the damage range of explosion shockwaves. In this paper, a finite element model of multi-sources FAE explosion is established to simulate the process of multiple shockwaves propagation and interaction. The model is verified with the experimental data of a fourfold-source FAE explosion, with the total fuel mass of 340 kg. Simulation results show that the overpressure fields of multi-sources FAE explosions are different from that of the single-source. In the case of multi-sources, the overpressure fields are influenced significantly by source scattering distance and source number. Subsequently, damage ranges of overpressure under three different levels are calculated. Within a suitable source scattering distance, the damage range of multi-sources situation is greater than that of the single-source, under the same amount of total fuel mass. This research provides a basis for personnel shockwave protection from multi-sources FAE explosion.

Keywords
Fuel-air explosive
Numerical simulation
Multi-sources explosion
Shockwave overpressure field



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=7201686187
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.