Effect of metal powders on explosion of fuel-air explosives with delayed secondary igniters

Received: 14 Mar 2021, Revised: 20 Mar 2021, Accepted: 10 June 2021, Available online: 18 June 2021, Version of Record: 18 June 2021

Yong-xu Wang a b, Yi Liu c, Qi-ming Xu a, Bin Li a, Li-feng Xie a
a
School of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210094, PR China
b
Xian Modern Chemistry Research Institute, Xian, Shaanxi, 710065, PR China
c
China Research and Development Academy of Machinery Equipment, Beijing, 100089, PR China

Abstract


In order to improve the energy level of fuel air explosive(FAE) with delayed secondary igniters, high energetic metal powders were added to liquid fuels mainly composed of ether and isopropyl nitrate. Metal powders’ explosive properties and reaction mechanisms in FAE were studied by high-speed video, pressure test system, and infrared thermal imager. The results show that compared with pure liquid fuels, the shock wave overpressure, maximum surface fireball temperature and high temperature duration of the mixture were significantly increased after adding high energetic metal powder. The overpressure values of the liquid-solid mixture at all measuring points were higher than that of the pure liquid fuels. And the maximum temperature of the fireball was up to 1700 °C, which was higher than that of the pure liquid fuels. After replacing 30% of aluminum powder with boron or magnesium hydride, the shock wave pressure of the mixture was further increased. The high heat of combustion of boron and the hydrogen released by magnesium hydride could effectively increase the blast effect of the mixture. The improvement of the explosion performance of boron was better than magnesium hydride. It shows that adding high energetic metal powder to liquid fuels can effectively improve the explosion performance of FAE.

Keywords
Fuel air explosive
Aluminum powder
Boron
Magnesium hydride
Explosion performance



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=36178846400
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.