Contact inequality: first contact will likely be with an older civilization

Received: 14 Aug 2020, Revised: 22 Aug 2020, Accepted: 24 Dec 2020, Available online: 25 Dec 2020, Version of Record: 25 Dec 2020

David Kipping*
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, Columbia University, 550 W 120th Street, New York, NY10027, USACenter for Computational Astrophysics, Flatiron Institute, 162 5th Av., New York, NY10010, USA
Adam Frank
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY14627, USA
Caleb Scharf
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, Columbia University, 550 W 120th Street, New York, NY10027, USA
*
Author for correspondence: David Kipping, E-mail: dkipping@astro.columbia.edu

Abstract


Abstract
First contact with another civilization, or simply another intelligence of some kind, will likely be quite different depending on whether that intelligence is more or less advanced than ourselves. If we assume that the lifetime distribution of intelligences follows an approximately exponential distribution, one might naively assume that the pile-up of short-lived entities dominates any detection or contact scenario. However, it is argued here that the probability of contact is proportional to the age of said intelligence (or possibly stronger), which introduces a selection effect. We demonstrate that detected intelligences will have a mean age twice that of the underlying (detected + undetected) population, using the exponential model. We find that our first contact will most likely be with an older intelligence, provided that the maximum allowed mean lifetime of the intelligence population, τmax, is ≥ e times larger than our own. Older intelligences may be rare but they disproportionately contribute to first contacts, introducing what we call a ‘contact inequality’, analogous to wealth inequality. This reasoning formalizes intuitional arguments and highlights that first contact would likely be one-sided, with ramifications for how we approach SETI.

 
Keywords: Interstellar, communicationSETItechnosignatures



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=24776235300
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.