Prediction of concentration of toxic gases produced by detonation of commercial explosives by thermochemical equilibrium calculations

Received: 22 May 2022, Revised: 07 Aug 2022, Accepted: 10 Nov 2022, Available online: 21 Dec 2022, Version of Record: 21 Dec 2022

Muhamed Suceska, B. Stimac Tumara, Vinko Skrlec, Sinisa Stankovic
University of Zagreb, Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineering, Pierottijeva 6, 10 000, Zagreb, Croatia

Abstract


An adverse effect resulting from explosive mine blasts is the production of toxic nitrogen oxides (NO and NO2) and carbon monoxide (CO). The empirical measurements of the concentration of toxic gases showed that it depends not only on the composition of an explosive and properties of its ingredients but also on several other parameters, such as volume of blasting chamber, explosive charge mass and design, confinement characteristics, surrounding atmosphere, etc. That explains why measured concentrations of toxic gases reported in literature significantly differ.
In this paper, we discuss the possibility of theoretical prediction of the concentration of toxic gases by thermochemical equilibrium calculation applying two models: ideal detonation model and deflagration model. It can be demonstrated that thermochemical calculations can provide a good estimation of the measured concentrations and reproduce experimentally obtained effects of additives on the production of toxic gases. It was also found that the ideal detonation model applies to heavily confined explosive charges, while the deflagration model is more suitable for low detonation velocity explosives with light confinement.

Keywords
Mining
ANFO
Emulsion explosive
Toxic fumes
Thermochemical code
EXPLO5



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=6602707254
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.