Biological safety in the context of backward planetary protection and Mars Sample Return: conclusions from the Sterilization Working Group

Received: 12 Feb 2021, Revised: 16 Feb 2021, Accepted: 25 May 2021, Available online: 18 June 2021, Version of Record: 18 June 2021

Emily Craven
Affiliation:
Mevex Corporation, 108 Willowlea Rd, Stittsville, ONK2S 1B4, Canada
Martell Winters
Affiliation:
Nelson Laboratories LLC, 6280 S Redwood Rd, Salt Lake City, UT84123, USA
Alvin L. Smith*
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena, CA91109, USA
Erin Lalime
Affiliation:
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 8800 Greenbelt Rd, Greenbelt, MD20771, USA
Rocco Mancinelli
Affiliation:
Bay Area Environmental Research Institute, Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA94035, USA
Brian Shirey
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena, CA91109, USA
Wayne Schubert
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena, CA91109, USA
Andrew Schuerger
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL32611, USA
Mariko Burgin
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena, CA91109, USA
Emily P. Seto
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena, CA91109, USA
Morgan Hendry
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena, CA91109, USA
Amruta Mehta
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena, CA91109, USA
J. Nick Benardini
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena, CA91109, USA
Gary Ruvkun
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Department of Molecular Biology Simches Research Center, Boston, MA02114, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Alvin L. Smith, E-mail: alvin.l.smith.ii@jpl.nasa.gov

Abstract


The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the European Space Agency (ESA) are studying how samples might be brought back to Earth from Mars safely. Backward planetary protection is key in this complex endeavour, as it is required to prevent potential adverse effects from returning materials to Earth's biosphere. As the question of whether or not life exists on Mars today or whether it ever did in the past is still unanswered, the effort to return samples from Mars is expected to be categorized as a ‘Restricted Earth Return’ mission, for which NASA policy requires the containment of any unsterilized material returned to Earth. NASA is investigating several solutions to contain Mars samples and sterilize any uncontained Martian particles. This effort has significant implications for both NASA's scientific mission, and the Earth's environment; and so special care and vigilance are needed in planning and execution in order to assure acceptance of safety to Earth's biosphere. To generate a technically acceptable sterilization process across a wide array of scientific and other stakeholders, on 30–31 January 2019, 10–11 June 2019 and 19–20 February 2020, NASA informally convened a Sterilization Working Group (SWG) composed of experts from industry, academia and government to assess methods for sterilization and inactivation, to identify future work needed to verify these methods against biological challenges, and to determine their feasibility for implementation on robotic spacecraft in deep space. The goals of the SWG were:

  1. (1) Understand what it means to sterilize and/or inactivate Martian materials and how that understanding can be applied to the Mars Sample Return (MSR) mission.
  2. (2) Assess methods for sterilization and inactivation, and identify future work needed to verify these methods.
  3. (3) Provide an effective plan for communicating with other agencies and the public.
This paper provides a summary of the discussions and conclusions of the SWG over these three workshops. It reflects a consensus position based on qualitative discussion of how agencies might approach the problem of sterilization of Mars material. The SWG reached a consensus that sterilization options can be considered on the basis of biology as we know it, and that sterilization modalities that are effective on terrestrial materials and organisms should be part of the MSR planetary protection strategy. Conclusions pointed to several industry standards for sterilization to include heat, chemical, UV radiation and low-heat plasma. Technical trade-offs for each sterilization modality were discussed while simultaneously considering the engineering challenges and limitations for spaceflight. Future work includes more in-depth discussions on technical trade-offs of sterilization modalities, identifying and testing Earth analogue challenge organisms and proteinaceous molecules against chosen modalities, and executing collaborative agreements between NASA and external working group partners to help close data gaps, and to establish strong, scientifically grounded sterilization and inactivation standards for MSR.
 
Keywords: Category , V restricted Earth,  returnin, activationmars, sample returnplanetary, protectionsterility, assurance .levelsterilization



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57225267898
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.