On the Calculus of Counterterror Policy

Received: 11 May 2020, Revised: 17 May 2020, Accepted: 22 Aug 2020, Available online: 09 Sep 2020, Version of Record: 09 Sep 2020

Daniel G. Arce

Abstract


In democratic societies, elections can act as a referendum on politicians’ counterterror policy. At the same time, counterterror policy is conducted under conditions of asymmetric information because the government is better informed about the nature of the threat than is the public. Using a hybrid signaling model, this paper characterizes counterterror policy in terms of its instrumental efficacy against terrorists, and also non-instrumental considerations such as the electoral consequences of policy failures. In addition, the equilibria capture the difficulties that voters have in assessing the appropriateness of policy in the absence of terrorism.
KEYWORDS:



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=6602565405
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.