Digitally enabled approaches for the scale up of mammalian cell bioreactors

Received: 15 Apr 2022, Revised: 22 May 2022, Accepted: 17 July 2022, Available online: 28 Sep 2022, Version of Record: 28 Sep 2022

Masih Karimi Alavijeh a b
,
Irene Baker c
,
Yih Yean Lee c
,
Sally L. Gras a b
a
Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
b
The Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
c
CSL Innovation, 45 Poplar Road, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia

Abstract


With recent advances in digitisation and big data analytics, more pharmaceutical firms are adopting digital tools to achieve modernisation. The biological phenomena within bioreactors are a key target for such digital approaches, as these processes are often complicated and difficult to scale. Historically, rules of thumb have been used to match performance indicators across bioreactor scales. Although such methods are well-established and frequently employed by industry, no universal solution has been developed to overcome the many challenges faced in process development and scale-up. Several computer-based methodologies can potentially be applied to bioreactor scale-up, including knowledge driven and data-driven techniques. This review assesses the state of the art in digital advances in scaling bioreactors and the advantages and limitations of scaling techniques. Traditional approaches and their constraints are outlined. The application of knowledge-based techniques is then considered and compared to data-driven models. The ability to transfer processes across bioreactor scales, to compare data and predict process indicators across scales are then examined. Finally, the role of hybrid modelling and digital twins and their potential in bioprocess development are explored.
Keywords
Machine learning
Mechanistic modelling
Biomanufacturing
Bioreactor



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=56575054300
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.