Using artificial intelligence to support the drawing of piping and instrumentation diagrams using DEXPI standard

Received: 14 Feb 2022, Revised: 22 July 2022, Accepted: 29 July 2022, Available online: 28 Sep 2022, Version of Record: 28 Sep 2022

Jonas Oeing a
,
Wolfgang Welscher b
,
Niclas Krink b
,
Lars Jansen a
,
Fabian Henke a
,
Norbert Kockmann a
a
Department of Biochemical and Chemical Engineering, Laboratory of Equipment Design, TU Dortmund University, Emil-Figge-Strasse 68, Dortmund 44227, Germany
b
X-Visual Technologies GmbH, James-Franck-Straße 15, Berlin 12489, Germany

Abstract


The design and engineering of piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&ID) is a very time-consuming and labor-intensive process. Although P&IDs show common patterns that could be reused during development, the drawing is usually created manually and built up from scratch for each process. The aim of this paper is to recognize these patterns with the help of artificial intelligence (AI) and to make them available for the development and the drawing process of P&IDs. In order to achieve this, P&ID data is made accessible for AI applications through the DEXPI format, which is a machine-readable, manufacturer-independent exchange standard for P&IDs. It is demonstrated how deep learning models trained with DEXPI P&ID data can support the engineering as well as drawing of P&IDs and therefore decrease labor time and costs. This is achieved by assisted prediction of equipment in P&IDs based on recurrent neural networks as well as consistency checks based on graph neural networks.

Keywords
Artificial intelligence
Process synthesis
P&ID
Process engineering
Detail engineering



Description



   

Indexed in scopus

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57258679300
      

Article metrics

10.31763/DSJ.v5i1.1674 Abstract views : | PDF views :

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

Conflict of interest


“Authors state no conflict of interest”


Funding Information


This research received no external funding or grants


Peer review:


Peer review under responsibility of Defence Science Journal


Ethics approval:


Not applicable.


Consent for publication:


Not applicable.


Acknowledgements:


None.